Filed under: uncategorized
Lately I’ve been successful in refraining from comments on the latest round of unnecessary controversy invited upon a local, well-known pastor . . . that is, invited upon him BY him. Instead, I happily direct your attention to Eugene Cho, another local (not as well known) pastor who has posted on the same topic, but with respect and love.
For those of you who read this blog and don’t know me, let me just state something that’s fairly obvious to those of you who do – I’m a geek . . . but about obscure, mostly irrelevant things. The traditional image of Geek (notice the formal capitalization there) is someone who hovers over their computer keyboard, typing code, and taking occasional breaks to play World of Warcraft. I’m not that kind of geek. However, because I believe geeky technology – especially that of the computer variety – will continue to shape our culture, relationships, economy, justice, education, and religion, I have a few techy blogs in my feedreader.
This morning, one of them, Robert Scoble, posted a short ditty trying to define Web 2.0. In the tech world, lots and lots of people throw that term around, companies develop business strategies around it, investors throw down huge bucks for it . . . but not very many people can actually tell you what it means. A lot of people use the term in ways that make web developers want to pull their hair out, because they’re so off base. Scoble gives the ol’ college try this way:
Web 1.0 was about pages. URLs.
Web 2.0 was about users. Adding them onto corporate pages. Wikis. Blogs. Myspaces.
Web 3.0 is about getting rid of pages altogether. Being able to make the Web YOU want or need.
But, Scoble also links to another tech geek blogger who muses on the question. Different responses over there. Whatever the case, I’ve gotten the distinct impression that most web developers would say something like, “I can’t define Web 2.0 for you, but I know it when I see it.”
So now I come to the question: What is missional? Lots of people are using the term these days in the Church. Few could give you a concise definition if you asked them. A lot of people would give answers that seem well off the mark. A lot would say, “I can’t define missional, but I know it when I see it.” There are increasing attempts out there by some very smart people to define it in clear ways . . . but the ones who say, “I know it when I see it,” may not even care – it’s more about living into it than defining it. Ultimately, there will be people who don’t “get” missional, but say the word all the time. Frustrating or not, it’s still more about living into it than having some sort of linguistic power over definitions.
Here’s some encouragement for you to do what I just did . . . go buy The Cobalt Season’s new record! I can’t wait to hear the yummy goodness.
Filed under: blogging
One should not be fooled by the title of this post that I’m a negligent husband. I’ve celebrated ten wedding anniversaries with Michelle, and remembered every one of them.
The anniversary to which I refer might be cleverly referred to as my “blogoversary.” Yesterday was the five year mark since I started this here blog. I’ve changed the template several times, but have been pretty consistent in bringing random tidbits about life, culture, theology, and mindlessness in a way that has produced a stunning following of at least 4-1/2 readers.
I had intended to celebrate the anniversary by announcing that I was shutting the ol’ blog down . . . mostly because I’ve got a new one in the works. Alas, I had a more pressing writing project to complete and wasn’t able to get the new blog up and running in time. Perhaps over the next couple weeks I’ll manage to find some time to finish polishing it up. Until then, I’ll continue posting here.
Filed under: uncategorized
Michelle and I went to the pet store yesterday to buy dog food. Michelle remembered while we were there that she wanted to buy a cat litter box scoop spoon thingy. After finding the right aisle, she was faced with a decision – which of the approximately 46 versions of an incredibly simple device was best? I’m sorry, but I just have a hard time believing that any store would need to carry more than one or two varieties – a plastic one and a metal one, maybe. But ergonomic? Comfort-grippy-handle? Hydraulic-sport-tuned-suspension-with-a-Hemi? Ionic-breeze-odor-reducer? No thanks, I’ll take the plastic one.
Am I cranky this morning, or just over-tired?
Filed under: politics
BBC News is reporting on a concrete wall being built in Baghdad:
Once the 3.6m (12 ft) wall is finished, people will enter and leave Adhamiya through a small number of checkpoints guarded by US and Iraqi forces.
The US military says the barrier is the centrepiece of its strategy to end sectarian violence in the area but insists there are no plans to divide up the whole city into gated communities.
U.S. taxpayer dollars hard at work to re-create a situation that clearly didn’t work well in Berlin? Decide for yourself . . . this just seemed a little on the ironic side to me.
I attended a breakfast meeting this morning, sponsored by the international missions agency of my denomination. Amid all the frustrating things that make me wish I wasn’t part of this denomination, this agency has consistently been one of the brighter lights – I’ve met tons of people that really get the Kingdom of God . . . primarily because they’ve served in situations where they weren’t the comfortable majority, and developed some humility and respect as a result.
While at the breakfast, I got to talk to some good folks, in particular, about the Church in Latin America. Good times.
During the “meeting” portion of the breakfast, some good, encouraging things were said. But mixed in with them were some things that made me scratch my head.
Here’s an example: “We need to help Christian in North America rethink church. What is it? A building? A worship service? What? We need to be able to show people that church can take forms other than the normal model we’re accustomed to. Small gatherings of people in informal settings can legitimately be the church . . . as long as they’re fulfilling the five purposes of the church . . . “
I was tracking happily with that, right up until the last line . . . five purposes. Ummmm, o.k., so if I’m supposed to rethink the church, why can’t I rethink the five purposes (which, by the way, were left undefined, and therefore, left me feeling sheepish and silly for not knowing them off the top of my head . . . clearly, I don’t know my New Testament)? So, basically, church can look many different ways in many different contexts . . . just as long as it looks the same everywhere. Got it.
The meeting was enjoyable and well worth my time (even at 7:30am). It’s just funny how in the midst of changing everything, we have the capacity to miss some things. I am certainly as guilty as anyone in this regard. God help us all.
Filed under: blogging
Five years ago I started blogging. Life for me was very different back then . . . in so many ways that it’s truly hard to believe that only five years have passed. It’s almost as though I’ve made twenty years worth of changes. Some have been easy and fun and rewarding. Others have been painful and difficult and disillusioning (and yes, in some cases, rewarding). Anyway, to mark the five year milestone, I’ve decided to move my blogging existence over to a WordPress format. Blogger has been very good to me, but I do b’lieve this’ll do me better. Oh, and after writing under the funky blogspot.com url for all these years, I finally threw down the bones to buy the spiritfarmer.com domain. Ain’t that special?
So, I’m sure life around these parts will develop slowly as I learn the new tools, etc. I know one thing I need to do is figure out if there’s a way to migrate my old Blogger archives over. Until then, I’ll keep the old blog live. Any expert WordPress users can feel free to chime in and school me.
Here’s to the next five . . .
Earlier this year, I read David Bosch’s game changing misiology book, Transforming Mission. It’s long, thorough, and so good in so many ways. It’s truly a remarkable work. Not an easy read, mind you, but well worth the work I put into it. I will re-visit that book many times in the years ahead.
As I was reviewing some of the notes I made on it this weekend, I came across something that was very curious to me. It goes a little something like this. If you were to take a poll of evangelical pastors in North America, and asked them what the three most important verses/short passages in the Bible are, what do you think they’d say? John 3:16, Romans 10:9-10, Romans 6:23, Hebrews 11:6 . . . what else? I gotta think that Matthew 28:18-20 would be included in the list that many many pastors would give. I don’t remember how old I was when that was one of my memory verses, but it had to be pretty early – I mean, it’s the Great Commission, right?
So imagine my surprise when I read Bosch write that this short passage of the New Testament that I and countless others have come to think of as central was basically not elevated to any special status as Bible verses go until about 60 years ago. Are you kidding? The way we talk, and preach, and organize our church activities, you’d think that this would definitely have been a biblical staple throughout the entirety of church history. Alas, it seems that it wasn’t.
So my question is, “What does this mean?” Why is it that something the church has so organized itself around wasn’t always given such importance? Not that it was dismissed or marginalized. I’m just curious about this. Perhaps that’s not very interesting to you. It caught my attention, though, so I figured I’d share.
Using the Great Commission has certainly led to the expansion of the Church, it’s fueled a lot of efforts at serious discipleship, and motivated many to take sharing their faith in Jesus seriously. Cool enough. But that stuff also happened prior to 1940 . . . what motivated folks then?
